Sites Grátis no Comunidades.net


Total de visitas: 17535
Personal Framework For Ethical Choices Pdf Free
Personal Framework For Ethical Choices Pdf Free

personal framework for ethical choices pdf free

 

Personal Framework For Ethical Choices Pdf Free -> http://shurll.com/bmvl5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reflect on the OutcomeWhat were the results of my decision? What were the intended and unintended consequences? Would I change anything now that I have seen the consequences? . Attempts to discern character traits (virtues and vices) that are, or could be, motivating the people involved in the situation. Consider who might be harmed or who might benefit. This framework also focuses on following moral rules or duty regardless of outcome, so it allows for the possibility that one might have acted ethically, even if there is a bad result. For example, two people are walking down a hallway and see a third person drop their book bag, spilling all of their books and papers onto the floor. This framework has the advantage of creating a system of rules that has consistent expectations of all people; if an action is ethically correct or a duty is required, it would apply to every person in a given situation. We ask about what outcomes are desirable in a given situation, and consider ethical conduct to be whatever will achieve the best consequences. Which action will produce the most good and do the least harm? (The Utilitarian Approach)Which action respects the rights of all who have a stake in the decision? (The Rights Approach). Impermissible: The opposite of an ethically obligatory action is an action that is ethically impermissible, meaning that it is wrong to do it and right not to do it. Ethical obligations are the same for all rational creatures (they are universal), and knowledge of what these obligations entail is arrived at by discovering rules of behavior that are not contradicted by reason. While each of the three frameworks is useful for making ethical decisions, none is perfectotherwise the perfect theory would have driven the other imperfect theories from the field long ago. Decisions about right and wrong permeate everyday life. In many situations, all three frameworks will result in the sameor at least very similarconclusions about what you should do, although they will typically give different reasons for reaching those conclusions. Some argue that suicide is permissible in certain circumstances. This is one reason why we can sometimes say that we have a moral intuition about a certain situation, even when we have not consciously thought through the issue. Make a Decision and Consider ItAfter examining all of the potential actions, which best addresses the situation? How do I feel about my choice? . This approach to ethics underscores the networked aspects of society and emphasizes respect and compassion for others, especially those who are more vulnerable.. When combined with the universality of the rights approach, the justice approach can be applied to all human persons. However, it should be noted that each framework has its limits: by focusing our attention on one set of features, other important features may be obscured. Permissible: Sometimes actions are referred to as ethically permissible, or ethically neutral, because it is neither right nor wrong to do them or not to do them. This hypothetical contract is considered fair or just because it provides a procedure for what counts as a fair action, and does not concern itself with the consequences of those actions. 2. TRADITIONAL ARRANGEMENT OF THE FIELD OF ETHICS:. Directs attention to the duties that exist prior to the situation and determines obligations. The parents are thus ethically obligated to care for their children. Also, because it emphasizes the importance of role models and education to ethical behavior, it can sometimes merely reinforce current cultural norms as the standard of ethical behavior. Consequentialist Duty Virtue Deliberative process What kind of outcomes should I produce (or try to produce)? What are my obligations in this situation, and what are the things I should never do? What kind of person should I be (or try to be), and what will my actions show about my character? Focus Directs attention to the future effects of an action, for all people who will be directly or indirectly affected by the action. The chart below is designed to highlight the main contrasts between the three frameworks:. Because the answers to the three main types of ethical questions asked by each framework are not mutually exclusive, each framework can be used to make at least some progress in answering the questions posed by the other two. It has a number of different versions, but Kant believed they all amounted to the same imperative. 5d80d7912b

nine months to redeem him epub bud illegal
acordes para mandolina pdf free
chivalrous knight princess lisa cbt
anne helene bubenzer epub to mobi
nutricion de pieles pdf free
2012 cba concours d'elegance pebble beach 2016
harry potter book 5 epub free
l'inglese per te de agostini pdf free
chicken feed formulation pdf free
max brooks la marcha zombi epub